What is really going on!
Yes review after first submition surprised me, but now from last soft reject that as i sad had 2 errors, which we solved takes 2 days and still waiting.
Bump, just wanted to know why is this kind of thing happening? Is this normal or no any official answer?
Still very slow here we are down 30% from previous month
this kind of comparison is not valid, since iphone costs significantly more then huawei and when you come to the store it does not have a sticker how much sales its got and rating and an option to comment there in the store.
It is a different kind of market. We are talking about fair competition terms. In our mobile phone provider stores all items are on the same wall, when a new item comes it is displayed separately for some time like here that is all or maybe if it has some discount etc. Now advertising is a whole different story those are mostly payed by distributes of that brand or if the brand gives a condition.
You have to give an equal change to reach those sales on the market, not favour a bunch of them.
Well that is at least my view on it .
Hehe, just wanted to bash that popular link button but in the end i doubt its going to change anything, the ui design is much clear as UX goes for us authors its the same if I dare to say worst since that popular button is attention grabber specially with the search being useless as it is.
I actually do not see this as normal, but hey what can we do right. We never had more then 2 max 3 soft rejections and after soft we went online pretty fast
Don’t know if this is normal or should i contact support, need some advice. Our new submitted item got 3 time soft rejected with just 2 bugs which we fixed the same day in couple of hours and resubmitted now its in review for the second day with less then 50%, this never happened to us is this normal?
Can’t wait for this one, great job!
this is not a bashing thread, just wanted to know what are the limitations to reviewers to not be able when giving a soft reject to test it all the way and if you do find bugs to provide all. Instead in one soft reject we get for example 5 issues, then second 3 issues then third again 4 other issues etc. and of course 3 different reviewers.
This is a huge waste of our time and please for future reference for some bug we do need to know how you got to those, for example there is an issue that we cannot reproduce in our test environments and again to communicate further on we had to re upload posting a comment and again wait, now this use to work to a degree a while ago when this times were a bit shorter.
However to be honest the first soft reject we got was lightning fast after that every re upload new stuff were found.
Please do rethink about the process a bit. I think it would speed up stuff for you and for us just buy testing everything in one swipe not in parts or is this deliberate for some unknown reason to us?