i agree with others, it looks good but not unique.. there are so many designs like this.
I have updated my template fixed spelling mistakes as mentioned above and changed paragraph text. it should not be related to ‘Birdbox’ now
typography isn’t looking good..
Design and features matters, structure is not a problem!
All Blog & Magazine websites have almost same structure but different in design, colors, images etc. so why do you think i copied design from that website?
that is just ridiculous considering it is not your design:nvoi said
quite bold, your approach to ask for assistance on a site that has been coming soon since 2009… http://birdboxx.com/ i seemed to remember the text and googled it. The text and pretty much the same design (although more generic) has been around since 2009, just look at the source code and here for a snapshot: http://web.archive.org/web/20100107160600/http://birdboxx.com/
What are you talking about? open my design and that http://birdboxx.com/ ... and look clearly are both look same to you? or are you specially concerned about copying text line?
Nice man!! Congrats
Thank you so much for all suggestions!! my template is approved now
Thanks, i changed font to simple Arial now.. i think looking better now..
Ready for submission? Can any TF reviewer pass comment here on this design?
Photoshop has a lot more font functionality than a web browser. It applies all kinds of smoothing algorithms. The best way to replicate how a font will look on the web is to set the Anitialiasing in Photoshop to ‘sharp’.