Posts by dreampopclub

I think there are already a few items such as the one you describe, but definitely seems like an unexplored area on GR. Could be a good opportunity!

These are great, everyone. Thanks!

On a Mac with CS3 , if you have multiple layers selected in the layers palette, use Cmd + Opt + arrow key to duplicate the selected layers. On my Macbook, it doesn’t matter if I use the up, down, left of right key. They all appear to do the same thing, which admittedly, doesn’t make a ton of sense.

Will also work if you only have one layer selected. Doesn’t have to be multiple, although it’s probably faster to just use Cmd + J for that.

Found this accidentally because it is the same keystroke I use to cycle through tabs in Firefox (Cmd + Opt + L or R arrow).

I don’t think Wordpress will allow you to execute any php that is not hard coded into the template files without first installing a plugin like Exec-php

yes they are if you made it in CS4 it will work in CS CS2 and CS3 , might even open in earlier version but i have never used earlier than CS.

Great to know. Thank you much!

Hi All. I’ve been searching around for a definitive answer on backwards compatibility for .PAT files in Photoshop. Does anyone know if .PAT files generated in CS3 will open in other versions of CS?

I’m sorry, I can’t explain it well

You can send me an email and I hope I can explain it better.

Really sorry.

Dear kailoon, I understand about the language barrier. Also, I did not mean for you to publicly identify yourself in this thread. That does not seem fair to you. Perhaps one of the mods could remove her comment, if that is OK with Kailoon.

Author’s tend to jump straight to the forums when they are upset and issues like these could be solve much better if the author contacted the reviewer via replying to the rejection (or even approval) email. Anyway, I hope this helps!

I brought this issue to the public forums because I am interested in the thoughts from the community of authors and also TF employees. It is important to me to understand the issue from as many points of view as possible. The forums are the perfect venue for such discourse.

Hello, I appreciate this follow-up and clarification. Thank you for taking the time to read and comment on this thread.

Umm, why I never had problems with reviewers on TF? Hmm, when someone is telling me “this is awful” then it means it’s awful and there’s nothing more to add. Besides, reviewers here are not to tell you “add a little gradient and border here, and it will look awesome”, for this, we have forums .

I agree that specific instruction, such as “place a gradient here” is not realistic feedback. I’m not asking anyone to hold my hand. The point of my post is that if the reviewers are going to take time to comment at all, it should be constructive. Why waste time editorializing?

I’m new here, and while I’m no stranger to rejection letters from galleries, festivals, and stock illustration sites, I found my first review from TF to be caustic and largely unhelpful.

Quote from the reviewer:

“1. The biggest issue is the color you have chosen. 2. The grass at the bottom is awful. 3. If you manage to improve the aesthetics quality, then you may need to consider to convert this into HTML . From what I can see so far, it does not meet the PSD Template requirements in term of aesthetics. Even IF you manage to improve it.”

How the reviewer could improve his/her feedback:

comments 1 and 2:

Fair enough. But, I don’t feel that I have enough info to make a successful modification. If the reviewer is going to bother writing individualized feedback, it should state a reason for not liking the element as opposed to just letting me know that they think it is awful.

comment 3:

If the reviewer is inferring that aesthetic criteria for HTML templates is not as strict as the PSD templates, he/she should state that explicitly.