No that’s not a real exhibition, it’s a mockup you can find on GR. Even that is fake lol
I was thinking about it.. and unfortunately I’m not sure if this is “technically” wrong because it seems he uses templates for his own clients and he doesn’t resell them on the internet..
but if you consider that:
- his entire portfolio is made of templates
- he acts like it’s his own work
- clients don’t know for sure where the graphics come from
- he has 10,000 likes on facebook and perhaps everyone thinks he’s a great designer
we can presume he’s ethically a s…..
What do you think?
..he decided to build his entire portfolio with mine and other authors templates! and it seems he has a big success downtown acting like he created all those stuff [link removed]
Queue moves faster, allelujah! Thanks to the staff for resolving this huge problem! now you can focus on the items quality problem
higher quality standards -> less homepage items -> faster review queue -> happy authors
..am I right?
I think Spotify still the best
I think I would be sending DMCAs once a day for all the presumed “copies” of my flyers. But sometimes you just have to let it go..
In your case I didn’t see the other guy’s work before the update so I can’t tell..
Look here this how Graphicriver Reviewers have no experience at all if you look at http://graphicriver.net/user/indieground
Then you look at this guy .http://graphicriver.net/user/Midograf WHY IN THE WOLD WILL THEY NOT TELL HIM THAT DOSE FILES LOOK JUST THE INDIEGROUND????? Nope They Just Let Him Slide!