Posts by relplus

Great redesign..

Envato – the Best !..

You badly hide your aspiration somewhat quicker to hide this thread. You have nothing to worry, here only people of “your religion”, you have rejected others It I, the blockhead, time has come to “club of atheists” to speak about “Buddhism”

rectangular shapes – and rectangular money – but God did not create rectangles (look at the nature) – you have come off a reality. You see only a competition and business, easier and more. Clear up..

Now about results which we have not reached. The situation is that that you think for other people, including something too difficult for them – thus being based only on the guesses. And the whole layer of people which search something more interestingly, than simple forms, remains out of work here.

While placing of it here would prevent nobody. It is not offered “instead of”, it is offered “together with”. But for some reason it meets obstacles.

If it at least proved to be true statistics – for example, here there would be a whole section “detailed” designs, but anybody would not buy it for long enough time. But you do not have such section, you have only thoughts about it.

Why there is no sense simply to discuss and consider how much the person has expressed pro’s and con’s – because here only adherents of simple forms now were going to – after all only them suppose here – for what reaction to wait from them? Certainly, they will protect advantages of the jobs. (Though even thus, in protection of such jobs has expressed lukk, for what to it huge Respect!) Therefore, it not “the voting” question, is a question of independent decision-making. And also experience, experiment which you (administration) easily could spend here, but do not want.

As I would like to apologise before JefferWay, for that that I “demanded” here the decision someone who holds higher post (owners) – but it not attempt to “bypass and solve something behind the back – and the reason not in disrespect too – simply I see that Site Manager cannot solve such questions, it only observes already established policy. Therefore here is required decision someone more free to make decisions. Here only they are occupied by something another, is visible more important.

But understand, sometime your simplicity will bother even to these people – yes while it is still demanded, but you in too narrow frameworks. I did not begin to do screenshots of jobs from the main page because you can come at any time there, and see all the same. Yes, all these jobs are beautiful in own way, but look. Everywhere squared shapes, where originality, where a creative? I see as many try to involve the buyer the beautiful pictures inserted into their templates, but after all it is illusion – the user should insert the pictures, instead of these is also the main thing – that will be if to clean a content? What advantage of the design?. I expect that fans of simple decisions again will start to protect the creations. But it is not necessary. It would be better, if you have tried to make yours designs really interesting. For now for me all of them are boring enough.

And more time I will remind – I not simply one “the strange person”. If there is one – means there are also others. Here could be a lot of such as I and therefore, it is a lot of designs. But while here them do not start up as sellers and as here nothing involves their buyers. Sometime and to you this monotony will bother. But probably already there will be a certain opinion on this resource and late something will change.

Still I hope that those who can make decisions, something will make.

But while, I will try to squeeze into narrow frameworks, preparing any more simple of the works. And secondly, I will try to present here the coded versions of these “difficult” templates.

I wish All Successes and Development!

So, the question remains opened, and it seems, nobody intends to solve it. Unfortunately, I too do not have time for infinitely to sit here and to persuade you. Therefore, I will sum up more low once again to what we have not come. Because despite the fact that what you repeat that all have already explained to me, but I have not understood, actually it you yet have not understood about what I spoke.

But before I wish to apologise for a negative which you here have seen. I underline – which you have seen, instead of which here was. I have not been aimed at a negative, it only looks so. And I will explain – I simply follow a principle True Friend For example, when I have named design CreatingDrew so-called or when I said that here many similar jobs.

Who such true friend? It is what, despite errors and lacks of the friend, speaks it “All to O.K.Ty as it should be”? No. Because, thus, it indulges its imperfection, does not allow to be improved. If the result of its work does not suit anywhere, and it still needs to develop and develop, but I as the friend, I will tell to it “About, it am class! You the good fellow.” – that I will stop it in development. What I the friend after that? After all I will harm it to these only. Think of it when speak about ethics.

Instead of this ”” friendly ”” flatteries, I prefer to tell to it is not design. It is bad. You need to work over it. I also have made it, having quoted a word design. In my opinion, it does not suit anywhere. And I am fair. Yes, it can be unpleasant from a position of pride to it. But it is useful for it. Think, what for you it is more important – flattery or true?

And I did not have a purpose to “tower” for the bill of belittling of advantages of another. On the contrary – I wish it to rise at least to my level, and to go further. All than I am engaged in a life, is subordinated an overall objective. And the main my purpose – to serve as the assistant to another in development questions. And I collect now the big project on this subject where all questions connected with development of creative potential of each person will be considered. I assert that each person can – to write all music, to draw, compose verses, and so on. So to take offence at me it is wrong. CreatingDrew if you want, I can send to you some training videorecordings on design which I have made. I really want that you designs were better, that they were not so-called. But do not suggest me to load it into local sections “tuts” – you see, what my English) And to study it at me is not present time – I am concentrated to knowledge of laws of Harmony and this World. And languages are a product of mind of people, it is an artificial thing, and I would not like to waste time on it. In them there is no depth.

Once again I am sorry, if someone has strongly taken offence at me.

lukk

Perhaps this design should be approved not for its money making capabilities, but to show that ThemeForest is open minded to a variety of design styles

yes!.. i love you, brother!

I understand what you’re trying to say, most of ThemeForest does look the same, same easy to create designs (following the KISS rule).

I for one am tired of seeing the same styles over and over again, and welcome something out of the ordinary.

Thank You!

But you have to understand, these designs are proven sellers.

Certainly – they fine are on sale, they are good in own way. I even think that they will be on sale all the same more successfully, than the detailed things. I after all also did not condemn them as those, I only spoke – look as much it similar. And it is on sale – yes, is indisputable – but while only because only it here and is present, correctly? We after all do not know that will be if to place here new, only we build while assumptions.

Perhaps this design should be approved not for its money making capabilities, but to show that ThemeForest is open minded to a variety of design styles

So it only a minimum! Besides, guaranteed And it is possible also the profit (I am assured of it) which will receive a site. And it is possible even essential if many other detailed jobs are presented, and having for all occasions alternative, clients will bring more money to all project, and will be happy, satisfied in a maximum quantity of cases.

I apologise; but I just do not have the time to go back and forth incessantly. Perhaps one of the other members can help you.

Here again – you simply do not hear me, you speak there is no time, you need to adjust and serve still sale of trams while selling ALSO cars, both bicycles, and racing ????, and planes (all is more difficult for serving and applying it – as you and speak, as well as affairs with templates are) but why it is impossible to sell Both that And that.

You speak above about quality concerning one, but about complexity concerning another. Not clearly. So quality or complexity? If quality – that you cannot tell that mine StrongTech not qualitative, it only difficult.

And what criterion on AJ? All styles are supposed – and is simple pop, and a house with its simply direct ??, both a difficult break-bit, and difficult ????? – questions only to quality. And here claims also to style, restriction only one.

And more, you speak about a practicality – but the practicality for this site is a granting of SET of ELECTIONS to the buyer, and not just any one. After all it is possibility, nobody forces, does not force clients to buy it. If they are ready, they take it. But if it is not?. It is not practical for shop.

And all of you think for these people. You think not of that practicality. And that that is told here by people, it is necessary to estimate proceeding from what jobs they – if do this pop jobs they will protect pop-style. And other here is not present or very little because you do not offer the goods interesting to them – make it, and they will appear.

Actually, if you passed here long time only a pop-direction then also users here all practise it – whereas it is possible to expect from them what they will not be protected?

But it it is possible to expect from them if it is sincere people, and for them the true is more important than competitive advantages. I believe and in such people too, as well as in the people having of enough abilities to realise difficult coding.

And please, if you the manager, do not leave – whom to me still to ask, I certainly count on the final decision of owners of the company to which has directed the request to consider this question, but you after all in an ideal too should be interested in it while you are protected.

While they are not present here, I wished to ask you, whether is possible (legally, and also whether interaction of the authors, one of which ?????? the designer, and another ?????? the coder is allowed rules TF). Namely – creation of the joint project, transfer of one rights to the part of job to another (it is required concerning a code?), with the subsequent division of profit (it is independent or are possible mechanisms for this purpose) or mutual cession of rights and placing of identical files in two ??? portfolios? As a variant, the designer could add the archive with something graphic, for example vector source codes, and the coder would add with libraries or additional functions. I have still ideas, do not leave.

But in an ideal I hope that owners will come and will allow to place here detailed ??? in PSD . (Though it also does not stir realisation described above idea as.) After all all of us different, one thinks one, another another, it is interesting that they think. If they as categorically put the same border, as you then there’s nothing to be done, I will try to send here comprehensible jobs, and also I will look for more free resources. But while this hope is.

sorry for my discrepancies in the publication, they because of a carelessness. And a carelessness because of weariness (after the long period continuous work)

- For now one more basic addition:

- If one disturbed to another, would be clear. If either that – or it. But unless it is impossible to place here Both that And it? What to it disturbs? I do not think that the disk space costs much – yes, it is more than a zero, but it and will pay off – even if similar files will not be too attractive (as yours in own way remarkable, and to someone preferable clear templates). But that that they will be attractive and will block all expenses on their support here. I am absolutely assured of it.

I even offer this experiment at my expense if want – disconnect to me possibility of a conclusion of money till that time while it really will not become covered, or you can inform me the size of expenses on support of these files, and I will compensate them to you later from the income received from these files, or you will take away all my earnings by then if they are less. Want? Though it also is not required, but I am ready on it to prove to you obvious, to illustrate it.

And by the way I already do something similar – here these pictures which I publish here, I do them and I place in a folder named “beton”, I mean I plan to support their existence there so much, how much I will support in general the site. It too certain expenses. Probably, for me they have the same degree of complication, as well as for Envato support of these templates, probably, even the big. But I am assured of success of such kind of jobs, and I hope that I will manage to explain it to you.

About observance of rules of a place to which you come, I wish to tell to your such story which me has lit up when I reflecting on a subject discussed here:

Present the remote city to which there comes one person, on the car. But having tried to drive in it, sees that further rails everywhere are laid. There are no normal roads, there are only rails. They are certainly thought well over, and support all basic directions necessary for moving on a city, it is possible to reach any address, and rails too come into garages.

And this person tries then to tell it – look, there is here such possibility – to go both there, and here, want, to the right, and want – in left, can abruptly be developed on a manual brake, or even to try drift. It is possible to go on fields, on hillocks, it is possible to jump from a springboard.

And they have looked at its car, then on the rails, have twisted amicably at a temple (a pier, mad) – the car will not drive on rails – they spoke – rails are not intended for cars. Also try to leave, having developed, to go for a drive on the – yes, beautiful and shining – but limited to rails – trams.

This person tries to convince them till now that it is possible to clean rails, and it will be possible then to go for a drive everything, and somehow, it is possible even on rollers and bicycles.

Can, you are afraid of failures? Rails prevent from it, As the tram electricity releases from necessity of torsion of pedals on bicycles and the exact detailed control of a trip. But as these children that mad tricks on the bicycles carry out – they after all can! Means, there is no limit to perfection, the tram is more reliable, easier, but the bicycle gives more possibilities, width, ease – at corresponding masterful management. You declare – in our city nobody will learn to go by cars, a maximum, on what our drivers are capable are trams, and they never will learn. It is too difficult for them.

Represent, you go from job, and about you such speak – you, probably, will argue. But now here dare to say about set today’s – and potential clients that they are capable a maximum here of it, and here it will be too difficult for them. It is possible to draw a conclusion, what you do not believe in people, why?

activce_link

No, it is not necessary a negative. I will try to explain to you through short enough time, but while here that:

but do not expect it to be played on pop radio

So why you decide to be limited only in it? It becomes that shop, in which only disks with a pop music. If the fan of fate comes there, or the fan of break-bit, a jungle. That that by it there to do? They will see that pleasant to them music are not present, and will leave therefrom.

Here, a good example – AudioJungle – unless there only section a pop music?. Fortunately, no.

AudioJungle:http://brovkin.ru/beton/aj.gif

Then why rather a web-dizajnov a situation absolutely other? Think about it.

That prevents to create in your supermarket (of web-designs), some more shelves for other directions of design. (As you have already made concerning music) is will not prevent to buy it to everyone the, someone prefers a pop music, and someone other styles.

“I even almost am ready” above ( the translation program does not translate that that is concluded in this symbols )