I got question.
Does that means that it is allowed to promote music without watermark? It’s really bad for promotion of personal listening track to have watermark in it.. So, if not, what should I do?
I think about some compromise.. Maybe it is ok to have track “for listening” without watermark, but some variation (or light version) of them as royalty free and with watermark?
Nobody likes when someone promote tracks with watermarks..
Approx 2-4 hours.
Soundcloud, twitter, youtube…
But I am skeptical about it.
I know j-rock (japanese rock) style and it is very cool.
If I was reviewer, I would ask you to change title, because it is not dubstep actually, but called “Dubstep Number”. It’s something like ambient, chillout or downtempo, but not dubstep.
But it sounds pretty good for me and I think that may be demanded by users who needs hi tech background music.