Thank you guys! Trying this now! Thanks again!cut round with pen tool if your used it in will be very quick otherwise maybee not!![]()
![]()
Edit:Worked! But I get a little amount of blur. Anyone know how to fix this?
Select > contract ?
Try that first.
Thank you guys! Trying this now! Thanks again!cut round with pen tool if your used it in will be very quick otherwise maybee not!![]()
![]()
Edit:Worked! But I get a little amount of blur. Anyone know how to fix this?
Select > contract ?
Try that first.
What he said, but use white/transparent on a new layer instead. Using white/black can cause issues when you cut the black.
In order to get it to fade out, you need to create a layer mask and then apply a radial gradient.
http://www.formspring.com/forms/?618060-pwoYpvH12g
I haven’t read the original article, so this isn’t a response to it, but saying that HTML5 is “bad” because it has issues is nonsense. It takes time for technology to be implemented and yeah, it takes way too much time for web standards to be implemented. Then again, when you have MS, Apple, Google, Mozilla, the Opera guys and a bunch of other big shots sitting altogether in one room (literally) discussing a new tag, it takes a while.
While HTML5 has a whole lot of issues, I think it’s semantically better than (x)HTML4. It produces logical semantic markup, a task for which it was conceived.
Both Apple and Adobe have outstanding strategy teams and both companies will wage war for the goals they seem necessary. Adobe is just as much of a capitalist venture as is Apple (and vice versa). The Internet is business kiddies.
The problem with bad developers is essentially that any schmuck can create anything on the web. Limiting this by some way or another is not only futile, but also against the whole principle of learning and Internet freedom. In short: It will never happen.
Personally, I like this quote:
We don’t have a single “Flash developer” at Big Spaceship. In fact, we grimace at titles like that.…We happen to be good at (and love) Flash, but we also happen to be good at (and love) a couple trillion different other technologies.…We believe in strategic thinking and great design and pushing the limits. Nowhere do we say it has to be done in technology X or programming language Y in order to be a successful and engaging project, and we don’t believe the users who engage in the projects we put out there do either.
Thanks everyone 
thanks msfx..for what lol![]()
![]()
Reaper is my programmer, everybody stay away.
This can’t be serious though, this is a pure copy of an often used internet joke, c’mon…
About 5-6 C, sunnnnnyyyyy
yeah I think i am going to go with the lenovo. The only thing that i do not like is the 15.3 inch screen wish it was at least 17. That is the only minus about the machine but the rest is top notch. Cheers Lester
Hey I don’t know what the res is at, but my 15” mac is just fine. At first I thought I wanted/needed the 17”, but that’s obsolete.
Lenovo is available in 17” right? Even in some kind of super wide setup where you have a small screen that folds open. (expands the screen to 18.3” ?)
I agree with nr. 1 & 2, I just don’t have them in a particular order. I can’t pick between google and apple. The rest of the list…can’t say I really care. Maybe Intel should had been a bit higher up?