I strongly disagree with that. I have been an active member of Flashden, from almost its conception and never once have I not understood that purchasing of components was for limited use.
This is why I don’t understand all the hoopla over licensing. Isn’t it sort of common sense?
Flash sites are poor of search, page rank.
Do you have any data to prove this?
The infamous “Page Rank 1-10” system is based on off-page optimization as far as I know. Anywho, high Page Rank does not always mean great listings which is why the system is flawed.
If that’s the case then why does Envato bother to encrypt our files?
It’s unfair for you to make this decision for all of us. Your contest is well intentioned but should not continue for this reason.
LGLab is right. FlashDen files are encrypted and posting links to these files would undoubtedly be linking to unencrypted versions. This competition would be better suited for non-FlashDen files.
off-page optimization is the name of the game
As far as SEO is concerned, there are many tools such as SWFAddress and SWFObject that can be used to achieve SEO success and I have yet to see tangible data that suggests otherwise.
And if it’s external flash content you’re worried about, check this out:
you do my nut in
Is this UK slang? I love it!