The word client alone (of an agency in this case) implies a resell. But that’s my only 2 cents.
Typically an agency should buy the extended license, unless they are buying the items for themselfs. There is no agreement, no special treatment. It’s just a market.
Again, no one should be offended, it is your work after all, if you are not proud of it then it is your problem. I have the right to my opinion, I have the right to criticize, you should take a critic and learn from it, I am not saying that I am better or something.
Final point, this is a competing marketplace, I hate to see authors with 200 items all bad, and learned nothing from that experience.
Did not quite understand what you mean. But some time which is spoken here in the forum, that the criteria are not equal between the reviewers. Some accept low quality jobs (personal option).
I was being sarcastic. So you are saying that they have a personal option to accept bad designs?
It is meaningless to fill a page about every 6 months about the quality of the print templates that are being accepted on this marketplace so I will keep it short this time.
Let’s give a round of applause for our reviewers, and their proud work. NO LINKS GIVEN
P.S No one should be offended about their own work. It would be absurd.
We need reviewers to NOT accept all this junk I see now on print templates category.
This is going to be bad. This gray offers a blend in for both dark and light authors design. Don’t do it!!
I nominate this Halloween Poster.
EladChai – You break it down very useful for everyone to understand.
ikonome – I think this is a good solution too to limit the upload process to 1 item per week, and as you get more Earning rates become a more respectable author you get the right to upload more. I thinks it’a a radical solution but the best so far, unless reviewers will be very selective not like now.