If half of the authors out there stopped submitting so much rubbish to the network, focused on quality, not quantity… Surely within minutes the review queues would be reduced? No?
Hi @MultiLeadia…. in my professional experience these ‘extra changes/requests’ initiated by the client are called ‘Authors’ as in “The Authors own corrections” or words to that effect .. (ie: client revisions/alterations). These are, and generally should be charged at an even higher rate above and beyond that of your standard hourly rate…or the initial agreed final project cost… and charged at an hourly rate for the duration of that extension. Next time, stipulate in your cost estimate that any additional work requested beyond the scope of the initial delivery of the final project or brief will incur these fees. This is not uncommon practice in the industry.
Hi I hv seen many copy logos and already reported few of them but GR did nothing. They just believe on DCMA thingy. Come on guys you can see easily the logo is direct copy and you are still asking for proof etc. For example Original logo: [links removed – please do not call out items on the forums, contact Support]
Guys you can see the copy stuff easily. And if you think these are not copies shoot me in the head. This is insane and GR reviewers are so noob to catch copies. Or support so busy to go in to details. GR should control this to maintain their quality. Otherwise everything you will see here only pirated stuff. Lol i am not good in Adobe indesign but i am very good in Adobe illustrator ans photoshop otherwise i was going to apply for reviewer job. Hehehe…What do you think guys?
@CreativeAuthor….. Welcome to the ‘Game’ !!!!