@Japh and others, Please tell me this isn’t so. I hope I’m just misinformed and wrong about this.
I’m genuinely curious why you didn’t create your framework as a plugin to begin with. If it’s “well segregated”, does that mean you could wrap it up into a plugin?
Is there a reason you wouldn’t?
Hey Japh.. where are those answers? It’s quite hard to read 45 pages to find an answer, don’t you think? Why don’t you create a FAQ with the answers that you and your team have for now?
Hi Bitfade, I am still monitoring this thread. There are a handful of questions that were raised early on that we’re still discussing internally and don’t have concrete answers yet. There also seem to be a lot of questions being asked that have been answered previously.
The first question you raise here is of the former category.
As for you second question, I don’t see that as being an issue.
Hey guys, so after these meetups are you headed to PressNomics? Because our team will be there and would love to meet you all, Helen, Japh etc… Cheers Adam
Some of us are, yes. Not the whole group though. Will be fantastic to hang with you and your team there though
Hey AvaxTheme, as you asked me specifically on Twitter, I will post a reply here.
So, the rejection message you received as a hard-rejection effectively means that the reviewers found your theme wasn’t up to standard. So much so, that the amount of changes you would need to make, would effectively make it a new theme.
Take the advice of other authors, and hopefully you can get some good feedback to help you on your way.
Don’t give up though! When your theme gets to a stage that the reviewers believe it’s almost there, they won’t hard-reject, but will give you feedback and help work out the last issues.