Posts by SonicCube

BCrutchfield said
We should just bundle all of these complaints into the same thread, and just keep reposting the same thread with every issue in it every week and spam it with hundreds of ‘+1’s or whatever will get Envato’s attention until they start checking stuff off of the list.

Here are the things that have popped up in the forums numerous times from authors and even buyers to no avail:

1) Search Engine
2) Licensing (The whole VideoHive issue, more options for ‘broadcast rates’, options for bundle purchasing)
3) Shopping Cart
4) HTML 5 Audio Preview
5) Rating system makes no sense for AudioJungle. Buyers can preview and even download the entire audio file(s) before purchasing.
6) The similar items feature is still exploitable, and it can still link out to multiple other tracks by the same author when we were told that that would be fixed, or looked into.
7) Pricing. AudioJungles production value keeps going up and up and up and up and up and up. Uploads sound much better than they did even 6 months ago, yet the prices haven’t changed in … 2? years. Not even keeping up with inflation.

Hello BC

I completey agree with you. The only thing which i dont understand exactly is the point with the shoping cart, what exactly do you think should be altered / improved there ?

Thanks again to everyone, and remember…...it’s the persistence that will pay off in terms of keeping this post ALIVE and an eventual statement of Envato

Hello Felt

Yes, i know the compression Voodoo allways makes things whorst. Strange is only, that other similar videos i have on Youtube, look much better regarding the lights on black BG.

Hello All

I have a similar issue with one of my templates that is on for sale. There where no problems on my Mac and also no issues on the reviewers side (probably alos Mac). Customers frequently report, that there are 2 files missing, which they have to re-conect trough the project library window. We have tried everything, but the problem still appears on some PC’s, no matter what.

So that said, it could easy be, that this is a OS issue from the various PC and Mac configurations out there.

Hello All

I have just uploaded 1001 different compressed renders of my new template in progress. Render looks good before YT upload. After the YT Conversion / Compression all the lights look jagged and noisy. Tried 32bit color. Tried adding a dark Blue BG instead of Black.

Does anone know a solution for this ?

My render settings in the example here : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_MX9WoG4YA

ompression: H264
Framerate: 29.75
Datarate: automatisch
Keyframes: automatic
1280 x 720
Streaming = Quickstart
Audio-Codec AAC

Thank you soooo much…getting crazy here with this:(

This month has been one of the whorst so far. But things can change as we still have like 25days

Hello Mat

I can assure you, that it hasn’t been as quite as in the last few months / year in the Audiojungle forum earlier (from the dev. and officials side). When Scott has been looking after Audiojungle, he was allways very helpful and did a lot for the comunity. Not to mention all the contests he launched for us AJ authors. I have the strong feeling, that like with every startup, once things have settled and the money flows quite well…people tend to take it a bit quiter I don’t want to blame Envato or anyone here, i still love this place / comunity like no other stock music site, but Envato should be aware of the “progression” a plattform like this needs all the time…...if not, we all know what will happen

So, lets hope, someone will soon show up in the forum and give us a clear and reliable statement of what will be up when and why it has been so quiet the last few months.

SchwartzSound said

StudioEtude said
+911 , from me
My question is: can we better give a link to the client, so that he went to the site Sound?loud?... Especially because we can upload . waw files and accordingly our preview sounds better than here?

Actually, no matter what you upload to SoundCloud (wav or not) they reconvert the preview file to 128 kbps MP3 (see here). So in reality the preview audio here on AJ is actually much nicer quality (320 kpbs MP3 ). As much as I love the SoundCloud player, I’d rather stick with AJ’s preview track.

First of all, THANK you for developing the AJ Radio ! It’s sure a great tool, i just don’t have the time to implement it into every single item of my portfolio. Regarding the Soundcloud preview in 128kpbs : I think customers would benefit far more from a nice and easy to use player with the possibility for authors to add descriptions to the timeline, than having a 320kbps preview. 128 is good enough to hear, if the track has a decent quality imo.

@StudioEtude :

Sure you could dot his, but it would be time consuming again and not looking very professional

@ Sound Waves Music :

Exactly, why should we not simplify and use the strenth of both plattforms if we all use it anyway!? Sure you can give a link to the according track on Soundcloud to your customer. Or you could also post the link in your item description. But then again, this would be just a workaround and not realy a professional solution.

Indeeed, it is super urgent for all of us. Think about how many times a customer will try to listen to a track on his non Flash tablet ? After the 5th item page that does not have a AJ Radio html 5 button, he will leave and visit / browse on another Stock music site where he is able to listen and buy what he needs.

Ok, one could say…the customer could still use his laptop or PC to browse for music on AJ; but this is just not the reality in 2012 and we ALL have to progress or will wonder someday, why we are no longer “in great demand”.

p.s. The waveform player in my screenshot is the embeded widget from Soundcloud. As most of us Authors have an account there, it would make sense to allow embeding these in the meantime. This is not a huge effort for the dev. team …. they “just” have to unblock it

Hello Justin

Thanks for your honest answers. Unfortunately this issue / development has been addressed by users since a loooong time, and we still did not get a reliable timeframe when we could expect this. When you say “it’s on the list”, that does not really help…Santa has a Ferrari F40 on my list since 20 years and it still did not happen

Please also see : THIS THREAD