Did anyone else notice that Slidedeck offer three versions on their own site – $99, $299 and even a free version, but nowhere on their site (as far as I can see) do they link to, or even mention their version for sale here, nor have any link to anywhere on the Envato marketplaces. In fact neither the word “Envato” nor “CodeCanyon” return any result in the search on their blog!
Does any other Envato author here have a website that does not have at least one link to their Envato portfolio?I guess they are not using us for sales .. just for exposure.
Annoying to see these little things Envato doesn’t consider and allowing those risky exposure robberies. Similar things happened in the past on Activetut’s banner Ad area. A page flip component advertised “FREE” which potentially makes it meaningless to sell that kind of files here. Another Flash stock seller advertised a bundle similar to Envato’s bundle. Those advertisers simply don’t link back to Envato which shows they are just here for diverting exposure of authors into theirs.
Another issue is from Envato staffs reply on another thread, any marketplace that doesn’t have multiple authors similar to Envato are not considered as competitors. These point of views allows some 3rd parties to test the water here about possibility of gaining exposure which can directly affect the existence of serious authors. I am not saying authors are losing but makes us to worry much about possibility of future abuse’s of such system.
Back to the topic after a long time. I just went through and couldn’t find the old bugs now which exitsed before. Guys can you confirm there is no issues, especially the “first time not loading iframe”?
Distance between the main topic and the recent posts are :
(Rotate the above thing 90 degrees)
^ Guys read the thread title again and see what you type here
VF saidNot this days when it’s come to flash here and it strict to a very small group. The most generate money is template sector and i think if you don’t touch the 100 sells minimum mark in 2 -3 month it’s a pure waste of time it’s not logic to make it,but hey we are not logic people here in a way . but if you make lots of small file on the massive and keep the uniqueness then i see the benefit but its hard to bring here uniqueness on each file
I think making files here is more beneficial than freelancing or full time jobs. Of course only if making stock files are not that much boring!
That is understandable but same applies for freelancing or a company job (less opportunity for Flash) so my point is we have different marketplaces to go for with the same 70%. Note the fact that before reaching the maximum % , DS might be spent a lot to Envato (than any other author). In fact he reached 70% when the rates were so difficult to achieve the maximum. I feel TF authors are too much lucky to start with better rates.
I think the authors who experienced well here should take the benefit of 70%. Looking at the different variety of available marketplaces here, I think making files here is more beneficial than freelancing or full time jobs. Of course only if making stock files are not that much boring!
Congrats Kontramax and goto for winning!
So your file’s purpose is only to add menu buttons on any target object located within the fla file. Similar to tool-tips right? That’s definitely an useful tool. In such case the content image you showed is just an example and doesn’t needs to be dynamic xml.
Not sure how your item titled, but I guess if your item title, preview and description conveys exactly what the file does, then the reviewer may understand easily (note the fact that if the reviewer missing the point, then it is hard to make the file visitor to understand the same, or hard to believe if a reviewer missing to read the description twice).
Addition to your current preview, I think if you add few different objects in the preview, for example one image, one shape fill object, one text field, then everyone can understand the usage immediately with first sight of the preview. 3 images in a row make us hard to realize purpose of the file.