Overall looks quite good, but I think it’s a bit ‘bland’ with no obvious point of focus at certain areas. Also, make the buttons larger. Extend the area of clicking for at least 5px to 10px more around the element instead of having to click exactly on the word itself.
The Blog area needs more polishing as well.
Or I think they will only show the latest 1800 items in any categories because most people will probably use the search (which has been upgraded now) to find an item if it’s published over a year ago. I doubt anyone would click through all the pages to search for an item unless there aren’t many in the listing.
One more thing. I tried to avoid making propositions, but IMO this idea is quite good:
- no support packages;
- option to charge yearly for access to “updates + support”
- option to charge one-time fee: no support, but life time updates.
So what happens to those without support packages? Will they be eligible to obtain the latest updates or they can only get the version at the time of purchase? This will probably lead to more support questions and it’s more difficult to issue bug fixes to these buyers.
I think it’s easier to just set a ‘lifespan’ for purchases, where each purchase is only valid for, say, 1 year. After a year, buyers can decide whether they want to repurchase the item (maybe at discounted rate) to obtain updates and support (which can be mandatory or up to authors’ discretion).
Basically Envato will just need to remove the file from the ‘Downloads’ section after the purchase has ‘expired’. Shouldn’t be too difficult to implement, but the impact of this towards the overall sales for Envato can only be analyzed / forecasted by them.
Of course some buyers will react negatively to this because their purchase has been ‘downgraded’ from lifetime to limited availability. However, seeing that most websites will be redesigned after a year or two (or some won’t be updated for years), I don’t think this will have much impact towards buyers. They will only need to pay around USD100-130 for 2 years of guaranteed updates and compatibility with latest software versions – a cost which I think is quite fair for what they are getting. Just my two cents.
My items are over 2 years old and they still have satisfactory sales per month. I haven’t seen much changes to the sales after the introduction of the new search system. I guess it helps to have something slightly more unique and better initial sales to gain the momentum, but that’s how this market works.
Typography and spacing aside, I think it’s probably not unique enough. There are also some bugs. For instance, when you hover at the boxes under Our Work, the ‘More Info’ tooltip has been cut off on the left side. The logo also seems weak and the footer doesn’t seem aligned.
You could have used better graphics to simulate how it would look best on real-world application. I am yet to see any HTML template or WordPress theme being sold currently using placeholders in its live preview. Distorted images really hurt the eyes (and your chances of getting approved) by the way, try not to do that.
UBLThemes saidI’m just wondering why would you want to opt out from this if you can get extra income through support? I mean, you are still providing support anyway, indefinitely but free of charge.
What happens if we opt out of this, but still support on our sites, legally you can not stop us from doing this, so our question is how can you stop this from happening?
Sounds good. However, I have some questions though.
- What is the new method of identification, especially for those in comments where the purchase date is not shown? The API should also be updated for this new feature.
- Will there be a way for us to identify immediately whether a buyer is still within the support period if he/she sends an email via the profile page? It’s not convenient to open the verification link for each email to confirm it.
- Within the support period, are we required to provide support for the item to work with the latest version of a software? For example, do we need to constantly support the latest WordPress version for our themes, or we can just provide support to the advertised versions?
It will be an endless cycle to provide support to the latest version because there will always be a buyer who made a purchase within 6 months from the date of release of the new version. On the other hand, I think buyers would expect it to work with the latest version within the support period (imagine you’ve bought a new theme yesterday but it can’t work today after the update, so you’ve contacted the author but was told that the theme would never be updated to run on the latest version although you’re still within the support period).
I think it’s better to have an option to stop selling the theme while keeping it supported / accessible for another 6 months because if I am not wrong, buyers will not be able to download the item once it’s taken off the market (which happens 1 month after confirming deletion of the item). At least authors can phase-out an old item ‘gracefully’ with such option.
I’m quite eager to see how this will be implemented. Seems like those top sellers will get a lot of extra income from this new policy with their huge customer base.
Your score: 3
Age range: 20-29
Best score for your gender and age range: 0
Highest score for your gender and age range: 4970
But it really hurts the eyes
tranmautritam saidI concur. Your PSD was submitted more than a year ago, and the HTML version was approved in January this year. So, by definition, the design is already older than a year and it does show its age when you compare it with the latest items. If your HTML was approved 2-3 months ago, perhaps they will still accept this WP theme as it hasn’t looked so ‘dated’ yet.
I think web design trending change too fast. You need improve designs in wp version for this time.
Nevertheless, I think there’s higher standards set for WP themes as there are many submissions to this category at the moment. Good luck!