Looks totally amazing – the ONLY reason i could see for it not to be accepted is that is a very close clone of the great selling Crevision Theme.
I mean, look at the “About us”, “Our team” or “Contact” pages and match them against the original Crevision theme.. you’ll see what i mean.
That said, to me it looks like an even better template than Crevision, i love the testimonials page and the sliders look great – i just guess you got penalised for ripping too much from Crevision.Simon
Hey Simon, i’m glad you like it and thanks for the feedback. There are many templates that look similar to each other and i’m agree with you that maybe this is the main problem.
And I meant include the main logo on the crown, on the ACTUAL webpage. It’s a great logo.
Thanks man, it’s a good idea!
I’m still waiting for the reply of the support team
Here is mine breecode.skype
I just pointed out the issues which I think critical, there are probably more and I don’t even know the full min-requirements for TF atm such as W3C validation, i.e. You should fix as many as you can as it will give you a learning experience for your future submissions.
I can’t really fault it. I think if you add too many details it tends to get cluttered. I do like the idea of the nav bar maybe being a little bit darker to contrast the menu.
And the icon is great. Why not include it on the actual web page?Then I think submit it again. Because it is a html template they are generally more lenient.
@Kungfu-Themes thanks for your feedback, you mean put the responsive nav in the normal page?
1.Shoutbox font (typography) looks bad. 2.Footer font and typo also look bad. 3.Slider is to overload with features or something is bad executed (can’t tell, sue me for that ) 4.Contact page need fixes. 5.The sidebar and posts (blog section) are to glued together. Blog also need a little typo work.
This is just quick feedback, for more please take a look at other files on the marketplace.Cheers.
@web20donkey, Thanks man! Thanks for taking the time to see it!
spacing and typography needs some polishing, the overall look and feel is great, just don’t rush and wait for the detailed version for the reason of rejection, your theme is great just need some polishing, good luck
@chamakmak, thanks buddy . I’m waiting the reply of the support.
It’s ok but not perfect. Placing a large image in the slider and expecting that that will make the theme stand out and look better is just plain wrong.
For me, simple designs require even more careful inspection.
top nav: can be improved by adding some background pattern and grey color. Slider: should be improved, call to action button can be improved and there is too much mess in the slider text, slider pagination is not perfect.
footer: can be improved, looks too much simple and i see that often on plain black-grey-white themes
your blog section also can be improved, the overall red color you use i think it can be a bit darker shade.
You also don’t use any of the new CSS3 transition effects on buttons/elements, for a simple design with no gradients, etc, i think its required.
your blog pagination is a must to be improved as well in terms of execution.cheers.
@MegaThemes, thank you for the feedback, you say that with that improvements Niantica have to be accepted? I know that the template isn’t perfect but i think that it is very good.