You are definitely making progress – think like this (sorry been teaching people recently!)...
If I were a buyer why would I buy your design over the countless other one page designs on here that are already coded (aside form maybe wanting to put it into my own /CMS but even then HTML would be easier)?
To me (few type issues aside) you have a really nice building block to work with BUT you still need to add something that catches the reviewers eye and makes it stand out.
If you look at for example ‘Bridge’ by Qode – they have the cover box thing http://demo.qodeinteractive.com/bridge/cover-boxes/ so its hardly rocket science design BUT how many times have you seen it on other files? It is these little touches that not only make it unique BUT also excuses tiny flaws in design that would otherwise cause some files to be rejected.
Also think short codes, elements etc and avoid ALL central text.
Look at other good PSDs (at random) http://themeforest.net/theme_previews/8234565-sim-one-page-psd-template?index=1&url_name=sim-one-page-psd-template – look at the fonts and the type – while variable when necessary it is accurate and consistent. Add this to yours (Gill sans font?) and it will completely change the design.
I have spent 3 days with someone trying to get their first file approved – two key points always keep coming up Versatility (without overloading pointless features and most of all attention to detail.
Best answers are form the author here is their support forum http://support.apollo13.eu/?envato_item_id=3391790 good luck
Some nice features especially the rollovers.
Typography need attention throughout
footer needs work
crop down menu looks a bit cramped
‘top’ button is pixelated
contact/about pages feel incomplete and blank space
sidebar a bit long on men/woman so ads cause blank space below items
kids is empty
avoid semi naked pics on blog
titles on quick view too small
Think attention to detail
Its not bad but has been done a lot of times and lacks originality.
Typography on portfolio filter and team names needs work
Hi, this is a general forum and not best suited for specific item requests. The auhtor uses the comments for the item http://themeforest.net/item/soulmedic-flat-responsive-medical-health-theme/6282832/support BUT please note you will need to login using the account which purchased the item (your current account has no buyer badge) so that they author can verify you as a buyer.
A vast improvement on where it was.
Typography still needs work although less of it – focus on consistency in sizing esp in how it works/team/services
I think you would have a much better chance if coded if that is an option
You still need to add something stand out about it. Right now it is much better but still lacks noticeable uniqueness.
Who is copyright ‘valley craft’? Not your profile name or page title?
Generally I think it is not bad.
Not a fan of the logo and the strap line looks weak
I’s lose all the italic fonts throughput – they do not work great with the font choice and ruin it a bit
Sidebar widgets look clean but calendar shows July with back button to April?
Footer could be tidier/more creative – it looks a bit squashed right now.
Definitely surprised it was a hard rejection
For what its worth that site is no where near the standard to be accepted here either. Good luck with your project
No worries. Good luck
p.s. be careful of alignment and spacing to throughout – the header looks like there are issues between logo/icons/top nav/main nav already.