The star system, as it currently stands, is seriously flawed.
yeap… totaly true.
and it is even worse when buyer becomes aware that we are sensitive to the rating of that item. Then he feels he has power over it. Now he can rate it in 3 or 2 or 1 star if in example I decide to not to give him the footage which is used in the preview. This happened to me. It actualy shocked me.
And all the authors are writing all this stuff, spending time in forums discusing these matters, it is interesting if any of the local envato government reads all this. I hope they do.
Why no one is sharing a link where to download the file ?
How will AJ authors use it if they can’t download it ?
1. Fixed and worked out good rating system.. current rating system is disadvantage to authors.
2. Video in profile
3. Separated statements and earnings for each marketplaces.
Basicly as I understand it, it is the same as an artist/painter gets a job to paint a huge facebook sign for a coffee shop because there is something like discounts or whatever who becomes fan of that coffee shop in the facebook. The coffee shop owner doesn’t have to invite workers from US, from facebook itself, nor it has to inform Mark Zuckerberg about that huge logo on the wall. But owner has to pay money for the painter, because painter painted and used paint which he bought himself, and he spent the time which he needed to paint it.
Is this all right?
Is this why we can make logos of Youtube and Facebook as stock footage?
I realy need to know it.
At first I realy would like you to understand that I am not being negative I just realy want to understand for myself
So the question is: how come that there are items in VH as stock footage and as templates which originaly includes prerendered footage of well known logos?
This is allowed ? I mean obviously it is allowed. So well known logos as stock footage, which can be potentialy used, is ok ?