i also like the design , i mean it´s really good .
it seems it is silmar to other themes. (read ths above)
did you get a massage from the reviewer about this not only standart rejection?
i have the same problem with my theme but. and trxy to get in contact with the reviewer but he dont give a answer to me.
this can be help - the logo does´t looks good . - a little to easy at all - the footer background looks bad . points , the struckture must be more advanced
@glossycat i open an other thread cause the last thred was the topic for the previous rejection. if you see i take many advices . but for new readers they is not easy to understand , cause the design has changed.
i wait for the reasons for the reviewer . maybe anybody else can give me comments want is wrong – to much grey ?
i think so too “
organize them in a admin format is a good idee , ( i like the on / off button )
but first ask the reviewer what is really wrong with this.
my tast theme is also rejected and i did´t understand it , i hope the reviewer will give me feedback.
my other can give me comments (i post in the wrong forum)
Please have a look and give a comment what can I do about the theme ? if you think its ok please comment also this ?
First , I was make this template as a psd – template than it calls make this as a html-template .
than i get the standard rejcted text .
on a scala from 10 to 0 ( 10 is highest ) for those themes i will give the theme 6 points . 8 will need to get ba approved .
if i look your other work it look more clearness and easyier to read . http://www.themeforest.luglio7.com/lambert/01/about-2/ this example is not easy to read , and the headlines looks not good , the background is one problem . if i the aboutsite – they looks quite boring.
also the typo in this head “http://wizardmedien.de/_html/bb/index.php” looks bad
i think the level goes high on theme forrest i be also rejceted
with this example we do some further work:( so you can not really the rejected theme
but i was also little shocked by myself as it was rejected the first time . but i found some improvement. but i think you have some work to do
good luck jens
rellly thanks for the help . we have made some further development
since the entry from ” ZefWebDesign “
i dont finde the background not really strong . without the cicles it it better bur maybe to easy .
the logo in not good. av is to high and the topic from the theme looks different the position are ok.
but in total its look not profational