Isn’t that a downgrade from 35mm to digital projectors? Cinemas in our country always had a standard projector for Ads that they show before the movie and then turn on the actual 35mm projector for the movie. That way, making it cheap for Ads and maintain quality for movies.
Hikari-Pictures saidBad thing is that some still haven’t figured the relation between object proportions and frame size which leads to Full HD projects that looks like 640×360 is their maximum resolution. I’m affraid to see 4K projects that technically has huge resolution, but visually looks big, bulky and low rez.
4k era is knocking to our doors, its time to get good machines for that
I have better Idea with time travel… I will get back in time and create the photos hanging on the tree
That is a small idea. Better travel a bit further back and lend a few bucks to Zuckeberg. 1000$ or so should be enough to give you instant retirement when you return to 2014
not to break the party but is not that this action will delete his previous update from queue and in the end his file will not be updated at all?
His update was already approved when he realized he forgot the checkbox. Not entirely sure how the queue works, but if the update is still pending and you submit another one it could be that original one gets replaced. However, this was not the case.
Build a time machine, travel back in time, mark the checkbox and return back to current time.
If that is not an option you can simply submit a tag update for your item without resubmitting any files and remember to mark the checkbox. If you forget to do it again, then time machine is your only choice
Hey guys, take a look to this project:
I dont know, maybe I’m wrong…but it’s pretty similar to this one:
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I’ve forwarded your concerns to Support team and they will investigate this case. If anyone else already contacted support about this same issue – please post your ticket number here so that i can link them together and support doesn’t have to deal with several tickets regarding the same issue.
Meanwhile i would like to remind you that it’s not a good practice to call out fellow authors publicly with a copyright concerns. The proper way is to contact support and they will carry out the investigation. By doing this publicly you’re risking to accuse innocent author or give the guilty author a chance to clean the mess before an investigation is carried out.
Thank you for bringing those issues to our attention. They will be investigated. However please always remember that proper way of doing this is to contact support. Accusing authors publicly is not a good thing. Sometimes it can help guilty authors to clean up the evidences or give a bad image to innocent authors.
Please do keep informing support about suspicious things that comes to your attention.
Often time it’s not the cheap or expensive equipment that you have, but the way you use it. The subject matter that you choose, how well you plan your shot, composition, light etc. When you create your next stock footage clip don’t shoot something just because you can shoot it. Carefully plan your project. Think of potential uses for the clip, think of potential buyers and think of their potential needs. I know stock footage is a random game and you can never know who will need some really random shot, but if you create targeted shots there is a much higher chance to sell them.
I don’t review stock footage category so take my comment as an author not a reviewer.