PhotoDune should take action to avoid the duplicate images. I see it as spam and definitely not user frendly
Unfortunately, I think that’s allowed. There are many such pictures at PhotoDune. When I look at two “Red Post Boxes” picture, I do not believe what I see.
A photo portrait goes like this: Subject capture pose, in the same position you get 100 stock images:
one for left eye blink, one for right eye blink, smile and blink left eye, smile and blink right eye, open mouth, raised left eyebrow, raised right eyebrow, look left, look right, look down, look up, left hand moved 5 cm to the left, right hand moved to the right 5 cm and so on….
Unfortunately, even those popular photographers work that way. The only way you can have a portfolio of 20000 photos
My 3D Graph render got rejected. What improvements can be made. Any suggestions is appriciated.
This is my third item which is rejected. I do not know what I doing wrong.
PhotoDune only acept jpeg photos. You can edit ITCP data in Photoshop. Go File – File Info and edit title, description and keywords …
If it really exists, it can be very useful in macro photography.
Due to the small depth of field is difficult to get some small subjects completely focused, and sometimes we have to shoot a few times and focus on different parts of the subject to get the subject sharp.
It is best to wait and see whether it is scam or not
Here’s what I noticed and what I think needs to be fixed:
Sort by relevance: descending or ascending – nothing happens when you change
Also for example: in the category “Animals” from the beginning showing the same images. I do not know on which system works “Sort By Relevance”, but I hope that we will not have to constantly watch one ugly duck on the front page
I also noticed that there are duplicate files on PhotoDune:
There are many such duplicates, someone has learned how to cheat the system. It is no wonder that some authors have up to 20,000 images. I just want the best for PhotoDune.
After this month will slowly improve sales. At least I hope so. It was similar last year.