I finally got my t-shirt a few days ago. Image sucks, as it was self-shot, and I had to do it asap because it’s quite cold here these days
Yeah, I can’t wait for some warmer season to proudly wear this tee everywhere around
the new comment section with search enabled is accessible through this link and works with other files, too: http://themeforest.net/item/avada-responsive-multipurpose-theme/2833226/comments
Yes! It works for all items with similar link.This is definitely a progress!
In the future I should better read threads up to the last comment, before I start experimenting, as I only came to the same conclusion
It works everywhere, just needs the different means of access
You can promote my items, no problem
Wooow! Such a great working environment for creative people!
Can I come working there…? I’ll make you coffee And cocktails
Yeah, I’ve noticed it too, a few days ago, when some of my sfx got accepted. I was (positively) surprised. Congrats!
Very good! Bravo!
There’s something weird – items submitted 20 hours ago have 60% on progress bar, submitted 3-4 days ago 30-40%. The same media type
I’ve noticed this glitch as well. But as it was mentioned many times so far, progress bars are mainly a cosmetic thing, not at all precise. They should not be used for granted.
Well done, Luca! Welcome to the Silver club
Regarding the new search system, I think we should wait and see. Especially because it’s still work in progress, it’s not a definitive thing, or at least that’s the impression I got from Michelle’s posts. If nothing, we are yet to see advanced search options (like the ones we saw a few years ago on a screenshot provided by Scott Wills). That can also change the way buyers find our items.
I think you’re right, Dejan, the article may not be telling the entire story, but I’m sure it was not intentional, but even if the full history is not included, Cyan has been involved with the watermark since the very beginning. Either way, I’ll let Josh know, the writer of the article, just so he’s aware, thanks for mentioning it, Dejan!...
Thanks for the AJ history lesson, Scott. I didn’t know all that
Btw, after reading my previous post again, I realized that my wording might’ve sounded kinda harsh. It wasn’t my intention. I didn’t want to imply that some info was omitted intentionally, it’s just that I thought that some info about older versions of the watermark could’ve been an interesting addition to the article.
Sometimes I hate my English skills