30 posts
  • 6 Years of Membership
  • Collector Level 3
  • Envato Team
  • Exclusive Author
WillHerring
Envato team
says

Those of you who are familiar with Bootstrap know that the maintainers of the project use the following numbering for releases:

<major>.<minor>.<patch>

We’re considering changing the compatible with Bootstrap attribute to show only <major> and <minor>.

This would mean that “Compatible with Bootstrap 2.1.0” would become “Compatible with Bootstrap 2.1”. Furthermore, “Compatible with Bootstrap 2.1” would be cover all versions of 2.1.

We would appreciate your feedback before moving forward with this change.

Also, for those interested, here is the link to the Bootstrap roadmap and milestones:

https://github.com/twitter/bootstrap/wiki/Roadmap https://github.com/twitter/bootstrap/issues/milestones

Thanks, Will

743 posts
  • Elite Author
  • Weekly Top Seller
  • Featured Item
  • Most Wanted Winner
+5 more
Orbital_Themes
says

Good call, it should be more clear now.

A little bit off-topic but still regarding the “Compatible with” item attribute – could you guys add bbPress to the list?

2280 posts
  • Top Monthly Author
  • Weekly Top Seller
  • Community Superstar
  • Industrious API Inventor
+15 more
revaxarts
says

+1

Good move. And thanks for requesting feedback from the community!

4483 posts ThemeForest Senior Reviewer
  • Affiliate Level 1
  • Author Level 6
  • Collector Level 3
  • Envato Team
+14 more
Ivor
Envato team
says

I would change the wording from “Compatible With” to “CSS Framework Used”, add zurb.Foundation, Skeleton CSS , Bootstrap, etc and ditch the version numbers.

2280 posts
  • Top Monthly Author
  • Weekly Top Seller
  • Community Superstar
  • Industrious API Inventor
+15 more
revaxarts
says

I would change the wording from “Compatible With” to “CSS Framework Used”, add zurb.Foundation, Skeleton CSS , Bootstrap, etc and ditch the version numbers.

Good point Ivor, something like “based on” is better then “work with” since buyers rarely switch the used version

13 posts
  • 6 Years of Membership
  • Affiliate Level 2
  • Author Level 5
  • Collector Level 2
+4 more
BryanMcAnulty
says

Sounds good to me.

30 posts
  • 6 Years of Membership
  • Collector Level 3
  • Envato Team
  • Exclusive Author
WillHerring
Envato team
says

Good call, it should be more clear now. A little bit off-topic but still regarding the “Compatible with” item attribute – could you guys add bbPress to the list?

I will put this on the list. Thanks for the feedback.

30 posts
  • 6 Years of Membership
  • Collector Level 3
  • Envato Team
  • Exclusive Author
WillHerring
Envato team
says

I would change the wording from “Compatible With” to “CSS Framework Used”, add zurb.Foundation, Skeleton CSS , Bootstrap, etc and ditch the version numbers.

This is great feedback. I didn’t even think of this option. I’d like to get feedback from the community on this idea as well. Good one, Ivor.

1034 posts
  • Author Level 3
  • Beta Tester
  • Collector Level 1
  • Exclusive Author
+2 more
BenSheppard
says

If bootstrap is included within the files wouldn’t “works with bootstrap” be sufficient?

905 posts
  • Author Level 3
  • Affiliate Level 1
  • Collector Level 2
  • 4 Years of Membership
+4 more
infuse01
says

How about “based on” or “included”. Since bootstrap also included javascript it would be wrong to have “css frameworks used”.

by
by
by
by
by
by