136 posts
  • Sold between 50 000 and 100 000 dollars
  • Referred between 10 and 49 users
  • Bought between 10 and 49 items
  • Exclusive Author
  • Has been a member for 3-4 years
  • United Kingdom
ThemeShaper says

I notice of late a lot of themes are using flickr images that use Attribution-NonCommercial for their previews..

I suppose the image itself isn’t being distributed, so it isn’t being ‘sold’ – but it is being used commercially in that clearly it is being used to derive commercial benefit.

Anyone know what the correct interpretation here is?

1947 posts Do the Needful
  • Envato Staff
  • Elite Author
  • Sold between 100 000 and 250 000 dollars
  • Has been a member for 3-4 years
  • United States
  • Support Staff
  • Author had a Free File of the Month
  • Microlancer Beta Tester
  • Contributed a Blog Post
+7 more
JamiGibbs Staff says

The way I interpret it is if the images are not being sold (i.e. not inside the purchased download package) then it falls within the Attribution-Noncommercial license.

3365 posts
  • Elite Author
  • Sold between 250 000 and 1 000 000 dollars
  • Community Moderator
  • Bought between 50 and 99 items
  • Referred more than 2000 users
  • Has been a member for 4-5 years
  • Repeatedly Helped protect Envato Marketplaces against copyright violations
+4 more
sevenspark Volunteer moderator says
ThemeShaper said
it is being used commercially in that clearly it is being used to derive commercial benefit.

I agree. I don’t think you can use non-commercial licensed images for a commercial purpose no matter what. Whether it is being redistributed or not is independent of the commercial issue. You couldn’t use non-commercially licensed images on an e-commerce site either (or any site that has commercial implications I believe).

In any event, better safe than sorry :) If someone is using images in an effort to earn money, they should be licensed for commercial use.

by
by
by
by
by
by