Thank you everyone for all the help. I made the recommended changes, shorted the url and added it to the description. Anyway I figured i would give you a preview of what i submitted.
The font used for ‘color printer’ looks like Bauhaus 93 (except the baseline ‘t’ is set to around -25) and it can’t be found on Dafont either because it’s a commercial font. Didn’t you say that both of the font you’ve used are from dafont?
@Mike and @GBS: I too, thought the same thing as in my first post but I believe that there are many items without font info in description so it seemed very unlikely to me that it could be the reason for rejection.
@GBS: Yes. Looking at most of the items these days, it looks like it is all right to include font info just inside the help file. About the license stuff, I believe reviewers do not check the licenses of the fonts. Although it’s always good and ethical (and legal, for that matter) to only include free for commercial use fonts.
Yeah I’ll admit i jumped the gun on this one completely forgot about the logo being a smart object with editable text. I owe an apology to GR and My reviewer.
Thank you for all the help
By the way it was approved this morning