1824 posts Videohive author & moderator
  • Weekly Top Seller
  • Elite Author
  • Author Level 8
  • Affiliate Level 7
+12 more
Mocarg
Moderator
says
http://techcrunch.com/2013/01/25/h265-is-approved/

Excited? :)

p.s. another reason to switch to mp4 for previews rather then flv :P

155 posts
  • 5 Years of Membership
  • Affiliate Level 1
  • Author Level 6
  • Collector Level 2
+3 more
didgi
says

Yes,i’ve read about this a couple of month ago.It sounds promising.

458 posts
  • Trendsetter
  • Author Level 5
  • Collector Level 4
  • 2 Years of Membership
+2 more
modeon
says

wow. Is there any test about it?

458 posts
  • Trendsetter
  • Author Level 5
  • Collector Level 4
  • 2 Years of Membership
+2 more
modeon
says

I have found this : ) Thank you for info Mocarg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGifAEK7iQc
1211 posts Making art out of nothing at all
  • Trendsetter
  • Weekly Top Seller
  • Elite Author
  • Featured Author
+9 more
3Ddym
says

Wow, this is awesome!

5327 posts
  • Elite Author
  • Moderator
  • Weekly Top Seller
  • Top Monthly Author
+13 more
felt_tips
Moderator
says

Sounds cool, but I don’t think it’ll be quite the game changer that h.264 was, somehow.

Sounds like you basically get a similar subjective quality for about half the data rate.

64 posts
  • Author Level 2
  • Collector Level 2
  • Exclusive Author
  • 3 Years of Membership
+1 more
MographMark
says

I hope I’m not the only one shrieking at the render times when 4k becomes the standard :S

512 posts
  • Affiliate Level 2
  • Author Level 6
  • Beta Tester
  • Collector Level 2
+3 more
5p1r17
says

Sounds cool, but I don’t think it’ll be quite the game changer that h.264 was, somehow. Sounds like you basically get a similar subjective quality for about half the data rate.

But that’s a point of 265… Same size, twice better picture quality(or vice versa). IMHO, this is a big step in a video codec world….

1607 posts
  • Exclusive Author
  • Author Level 6
  • Bundle Boss
  • Featured Author
+7 more
AndrVlad
says

Hope so. Article from the link above does not say much about quality. And personaly I don’t think it’s feasible to have twice smaler size for the same quality based on fact that it has to run on phones/tablets with still less processor power. But will see.

Btw, I have a question. Does anyone encoded 4K into H.264 with Quicktime? When I tried, it pop up with error so I was able to do Photo JPEG only.

Best Regards, Andrey

5327 posts
  • Elite Author
  • Moderator
  • Weekly Top Seller
  • Top Monthly Author
+13 more
felt_tips
Moderator
says

Hope so. Article from the link above does not say much about quality. And personaly I don’t think it’s feasible to have twice smaler size for the same quality based on fact that it has to run on phones/tablets with still less processor power. But will see.

Btw, I have a question. Does anyone encoded 4K into H.264 with Quicktime? When I tried, it pop up with error so I was able to do Photo JPEG only.

Best Regards, Andrey

There’ll be a lot more strain on the processor than with h.264. But processors have come quite a way since h.264 was published… and more to the point, as I understand it GPUs are able to decode / encode h.264 in hardware… that’s quite a big change…. and the joy of having a standard in the first place!

by
by
by
by
by
by