- Sold between 50 000 and 100 000 dollars
- Community Moderator
- Referred more than 2000 users
- Author had a File in an Envato Bundle
- Most Wanted Bounty Winner
- Item was Featured
- Author was Featured
- Contributed a Tutorial to a Tuts+ Site
Excited? 
p.s.
another reason to switch to mp4 for previews rather then flv 
- Bought between 10 and 49 items
- Exclusive Author
- Has been a member for 3-4 years
- Referred between 1 and 9 users
- Sold between 10 000 and 50 000 dollars
- Switzerland
Yes,i’ve read about this a couple of month ago.It sounds promising.
- Microlancer Beta Tester
- Bought between 100 and 499 items
- Sold between 1 000 and 5 000 dollars
- Has been a member for 0-1 years
- Exclusive Author
- Turkey
wow. Is there any test about it?
- Microlancer Beta Tester
- Bought between 100 and 499 items
- Sold between 1 000 and 5 000 dollars
- Has been a member for 0-1 years
- Exclusive Author
- Turkey
I have found this : ) Thank you for info Mocarg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGifAEK7iQc
- Australia
- Author was Featured
- Bought between 10 and 49 items
- Exclusive Author
- Has been a member for 1-2 years
- Item was Featured
- Referred between 1 and 9 users
- Sold between 10 000 and 50 000 dollars
Wow, this is awesome!
- Community Moderator
- Sold between 50 000 and 100 000 dollars
- Author was Featured
- Item was Featured
- Author had a File in an Envato Bundle
- Beta Tester
- Has been a member for 4-5 years
- United Kingdom
Sounds cool, but I don’t think it’ll be quite the game changer that h.264 was, somehow.
Sounds like you basically get a similar subjective quality for about half the data rate.
- Exclusive Author
- Sold between 100 and 1 000 dollars
- Bought between 10 and 49 items
- Has been a member for 0-1 years
- United States
I hope I’m not the only one shrieking at the render times when 4k becomes the standard 
- Microlancer Beta Tester
- Has been a member for 3-4 years
- Sold between 10 000 and 50 000 dollars
- Europe
- Bought between 10 and 49 items
- Referred between 10 and 49 users
- Exclusive Author
felt_tips said
Sounds cool, but I don’t think it’ll be quite the game changer that h.264 was, somehow. Sounds like you basically get a similar subjective quality for about half the data rate.
But that’s a point of 265… Same size, twice better picture quality(or vice versa). IMHO, this is a big step in a video codec world….
- Russian Federation
- Has been a member for 1-2 years
- Exclusive Author
- Sold between 10 000 and 50 000 dollars
- Referred between 1 and 9 users
- Bought between 1 and 9 items
Hope so. Article from the link above does not say much about quality. And personaly I don’t think it’s feasible to have twice smaler size for the same quality based on fact that it has to run on phones/tablets with still less processor power. But will see.
Btw, I have a question. Does anyone encoded 4K into H.264 with Quicktime? When I tried, it pop up with error so I was able to do Photo JPEG only.
Best Regards, Andrey
- Community Moderator
- Sold between 50 000 and 100 000 dollars
- Author was Featured
- Item was Featured
- Author had a File in an Envato Bundle
- Beta Tester
- Has been a member for 4-5 years
- United Kingdom
AndrVlad said
Hope so. Article from the link above does not say much about quality. And personaly I don’t think it’s feasible to have twice smaler size for the same quality based on fact that it has to run on phones/tablets with still less processor power. But will see.Btw, I have a question. Does anyone encoded 4K into H.264 with Quicktime? When I tried, it pop up with error so I was able to do Photo JPEG only.
Best Regards, Andrey
There’ll be a lot more strain on the processor than with h.264. But processors have come quite a way since h.264 was published… and more to the point, as I understand it GPUs are able to decode / encode h.264 in hardware… that’s quite a big change…. and the joy of having a standard in the first place!
