Logo Rejected

Reason: The overall quality of your submission does not meet our standard technical requirements and should only be resubmitted after being significantly improved. Please browse our current library for examples of the quality levels we’re currently seeking.

What do you think? What should be improved?

Thanks!

Ok, pardon my english am n’t good in expressing myself, Make it 3D cubes and leaving a trace of speed movement of little 3D cubes I like the “Pixel” font , what font is that?

Amrhamza said
Ok, pardon my english am n’t good in expressing myself, Make it 3D cubes and leaving a trace of speed movement of little 3D cubes I like the “Pixel” font , what font is that?

Okay, thanks, I’ll try that. The font used is Ebrima.

What do you think now?

I like the concept.

The only thing I have issues about are the blur lines. Logos are supposed to be crisp and when printed on black and white still easily identifiable. That’s why I don’t think you see many logos with a blur effect.

I like the second version better than the first. However I have to agree with “iamthwee” and I would like to add that you will have a resizing problem with this logo. Remember it has two also adaptable very small displays and still remain identifiable.

Maybe take just one of those pixels and simplify the motion trail. You can still save this as an option for big size displays.

Cheers

Chris