Part of the embedded code:
<html> <head> </head> <body> <object id="guitar11-sound-player" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="0" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="0" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,0,0"> <param name="movie" value="/logos/swf/guitar11.swf" /> <param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /> <object data="/logos/swf/guitar11.swf" id="guitar11-sound-player-2" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="0" width="0"> <param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /> </object> </object> </body> </html>
Good to know that.
But still I can not see flash menu options when I right click, or am I missing something?
FF4 .0 shows the guitar strings with multicolor while IE 9 .0 shows with single color. So I thought it should be html5, hmm…
Right click doesn’t says Flash and also I can see some js code handling math part of guitar, so there might be html things involving and flash might be an alternative content, not sure.
ha ha ha, -it’s not flash, that’s cool tho, I’ve been playing for like 30 min
I don’t wanna be a party pooper, though that movie doesn’t seem to contain anything and the main part seems using canvas. Anyway who cares, could have been made so much better in Flash.
Height and width are 0 for flash content, so Flash might be for audio only.
Audio capability is used, the rest well you guess.
For a company who promotes html5 like google making everything Flash is an insult but they can’t use html5 audio neither it’s still too immature.
I guess even after 5 years, the web element that having best browser penetration with full multimedia capability will be Flash. Due to browser instabilities (and war between MS, Apple and Google), html5 doesn’t going to give best user experience but lucky enough to be promoted in an ignorant manner.
I don’t think google can no longer enjoy non-evil club. Every private company has conscious blind areas to add struggle to user experience. May be Flash will be appreciated when Adobe losses a lot and allows to be handled by non proprietary communities.
I agree Flash would get much more love if adobe decided to open source flash player but I doubt that will ever happens Adobe is no Sun which got nothing left to open source Java.
Still the most argument that zealot complain about Flash is its proprietary nature, against the open web blah blah blah…