New Watermark

Nice idea. Though no-one has ever asked me what the Audiojungle means….

I particularly agree with the automatic watermark system. I don’t mind rebouncing files and everything, but it’s another time consumer in the upload process – which generally is pretty well streamlined.

+ 1

Had also few people from other places asking what this “audiojungle” voiceover stands for. Plus the automatic watermarking would be a nice to have as well

Yeah, great idea Tim!

“why is there a woman saying “AudioJungle” in all of your tracks?”

Same here!

Cheers, Dan

+1 – Excellent idea! I’ve been asked about that several times (on my other profile :))

—Joel

plastic3 said
Sounds good, and this idea already realised on other such sites…And i have an another question – when we will have automatic watermark system on AJ? It seems to me that AJ – last place where authors must do it yourself…If this is a question of money – i can contribute some $$$ for quicker decision of this problem, and i think i’m not alone…

Yes yes yes! Automatic watermarking! Every other company has this sorted, it seems that Audio Jungle is the last one that gets the composer to do it manually! It doesn’t take long to do, but just adds time to the whole process!

Kind regards

+1

I don’t mind about the automatic watermarking, and I don’t find it that necessary, but I would definitely prefer the “audiojungle.net” instead of the “audiojungle” watermark.

The automatic watermark is a must also it is the same with the automatic mp3 conversion and automatic creation of the zip file. As a software developer myself I can tell you that this is not hart to be done and it is a real shame that they force autors to do it. Yes it gives you some freedom to put the watermark the way you like but for the majority of cases this is not the case. If they want thay may offer two options MANUAL and AUTOMATIC .

As for the “audiojubgle” or “audiojungle.net” I don’t think there is some difference. If some one wants to present his work elsewhere and it need to be watermarked it is better to use his own watermark. And you can easyly add a link to your audiojungle page if needed

+1 for improved watermark

and definitely +1 for automatic watermarking and other automatic features (don’t forget song length).

+1 for making the automatic stuff optional and/or customizable too. Probably the reason why they haven’t made it all automatic to begin with is because it gets tricky when there are multiple files and stuff.

Sorry if this is getting off of the original topic but it would be great if you could just upload a straight song, or pack of sounds, choose the file to be used for preview and check/uncheck a box for “add watermark”. Then all you need to do is add a title, description and tags. Done.

However, from Envato’s point of view, maybe they are already getting enough submissions and don’t want to spend a lot of time making uploading easier.

The automatic watermark is a must also it is the same with the automatic mp3 conversion and automatic creation of the zip file. As a software developer myself I can tell you that this is not hart to be done and it is a real shame that they force autors to do it. Yes it gives you some freedom to put the watermark the way you like but for the majority of cases this is not the case. If they want thay may offer two options MANUAL and AUTOMATIC .