1685 posts Time is what you desire most, but waste carelessly.
  • Sold between 100 000 and 250 000 dollars
  • Elite Author
  • Bought between 50 and 99 items
  • Referred between 100 and 199 users
  • Grew a moustache for the Envato Movember competition
  • Exclusive Author
  • Has been a member for 4-5 years
  • Envato Studio (Microlancer) Beta Tester
  • Europe
+1 more
Firsh says

I’d like to know how to tell an adjustment layer that it should affect only a certain range of layers below it, not all the way to the bottom. I usually convert the group to be changed to a smart object, add the adjustment layer(s), and alt click between them. But It would be too nice to drag an adjustment layer in the group and have it only affect the layers in that group, maybe a hidden toggle somewhere?

3085 posts
  • Author had a File in an Envato Bundle
  • Bought between 1 and 9 items
  • Exclusive Author
  • Has been a member for 4-5 years
  • Interviewed on the Envato Notes blog
  • Referred between 10 and 49 users
  • Repeatedly Helped protect Envato Marketplaces against copyright violations
+1 more
Raincutter says

Don’t know of such thing yet. If the group doesn’t affect background then you can put the adjustment layer in it and turn its mode to normal instead of pass through. That way it will just have its effect on the layers inside group. But I guess you may already know that.

178 posts
  • Exclusive Author
  • South Africa
  • Bought between 100 and 499 items
  • Has been a member for 4-5 years
  • Referred between 500 and 999 users
  • Sold between 10 000 and 50 000 dollars
JinWook says

No you can’t have selective adj layer short of duplicating the same adj layer and clipping each one separably but that’s not the smartest way.

You’re already doing it the correct way. If you would like an adj layer to effect a few select layers then group those layers, make the group a smart object and clip the adj layer to the smart object, then you still got your group inside the s.obj.

:)

1685 posts Time is what you desire most, but waste carelessly.
  • Sold between 100 000 and 250 000 dollars
  • Elite Author
  • Bought between 50 and 99 items
  • Referred between 100 and 199 users
  • Grew a moustache for the Envato Movember competition
  • Exclusive Author
  • Has been a member for 4-5 years
  • Envato Studio (Microlancer) Beta Tester
  • Europe
+1 more
Firsh says

:bashful: thanks Honestly I haven’t thought of using the group blending modes, it solved it! The adj layer just sits on the top inside the group and group mode is normal.

1685 posts Time is what you desire most, but waste carelessly.
  • Sold between 100 000 and 250 000 dollars
  • Elite Author
  • Bought between 50 and 99 items
  • Referred between 100 and 199 users
  • Grew a moustache for the Envato Movember competition
  • Exclusive Author
  • Has been a member for 4-5 years
  • Envato Studio (Microlancer) Beta Tester
  • Europe
+1 more
Firsh says

..

3085 posts
  • Author had a File in an Envato Bundle
  • Bought between 1 and 9 items
  • Exclusive Author
  • Has been a member for 4-5 years
  • Interviewed on the Envato Notes blog
  • Referred between 10 and 49 users
  • Repeatedly Helped protect Envato Marketplaces against copyright violations
+1 more
Raincutter says
:bashful: thanks Honestly I haven’t thought of using the group blending modes, it solved it! The adj layer just sits on the top inside the group and group mode is normal.

np. Glad I could help ya. :)

200 posts
  • Bought between 10 and 49 items
  • Europe
  • Exclusive Author
  • Has been a member for 5-6 years
  • Referred between 1 and 9 users
  • Sold between 1 000 and 5 000 dollars
Goldenbug says

omg! @raincutter this is great! thank you via @firsh. But, off course there is a problem on this method. If there is a layer that use blend mode like multiply, it will not effect below layers outsite of the group.

2213 posts
  • Exclusive Author
  • Sold between 50 000 and 100 000 dollars
  • Germany
  • Bought between 50 and 99 items
  • Referred between 200 and 499 users
  • Has been a member for 5-6 years
  • Author had a File in an Envato Bundle
  • Author had a Free File of the Month
+4 more
crozer says

Yeah you can affect only a certain layers or groups below the adjustment layer. Either by scripting, or by a bit of creativity.

It’s kind of complicated to explain, but the functionality goes like this:
- you have layers you want to be affected, and others you don’t want to be affected.
- group those who should be affected, and above these create a new layer and apply the current image (image>apply image). Hide the folder (so that you can keep the raw i.e. source layers within it untouched.) Create your adj. layer above the layer with the applied image, and merge them.

So, whenever you want to create an adj. layer that should only affect a certain group of layers, apply an image of these layers, hide them, create the adj. layer above the applied image and merge both last.

I hope I explained myself, otherwise let me know and I’ll try to be more precise.
Good luck!

Chris ;)

3085 posts
  • Author had a File in an Envato Bundle
  • Bought between 1 and 9 items
  • Exclusive Author
  • Has been a member for 4-5 years
  • Interviewed on the Envato Notes blog
  • Referred between 10 and 49 users
  • Repeatedly Helped protect Envato Marketplaces against copyright violations
+1 more
Raincutter says
omg! @raincutter this is great! thank you via @firsh. But, off course there is a problem on this method. If there is a layer that use blend mode like multiply, it will not effect below layers outsite of the group.
NP. :) And yeah I already said, it won’t have much use if that group affects the background.

Yeah you can affect only a certain layers or groups below the adjustment layer. Either by scripting, or by a bit of creativity.

It’s kind of complicated to explain, but the functionality goes like this: - you have layers you want to be affected, and others you don’t want to be affected. - group those who should be affected, and above these create a new layer and apply the current image (image>apply image). Hide the folder (so that you can keep the raw i.e. source layers within it untouched.) Create your adj. layer above the layer with the applied image, and merge them.

So, whenever you want to create an adj. layer that should only affect a certain group of layers, apply an image of these layers, hide them, create the adj. layer above the applied image and merge both last.

I hope I explained myself, otherwise let me know and I’ll try to be more precise. Good luck!

Chris ;)
In a little simple way. Duplicate the desired group. Merge it. Hide the original one. Create the necessary adj. layer above merged group layer and then merge both layers, right?

But then using smart object is better since it keep your groups alive and you don’t need to go through hiding, merging and such things.

2213 posts
  • Exclusive Author
  • Sold between 50 000 and 100 000 dollars
  • Germany
  • Bought between 50 and 99 items
  • Referred between 200 and 499 users
  • Has been a member for 5-6 years
  • Author had a File in an Envato Bundle
  • Author had a Free File of the Month
+4 more
crozer says
In a little simple way. Duplicate the desired group. Merge it. Hide the original one. Create the necessary adj. layer above merged group layer and then merge both layers, right? But then using smart object is better since it keep your groups alive and you don’t need to go through hiding, merging and such things.

Not exactly, because applying images on the front (not on the back smart objects) will multiply their blending modes. Thus, the effect may vary when working on another ‘sheet’ – i.e. modifying stuff from/in the smart objects.

All in all, both methods are quite similar, but you’re water-proof when working right on the upper-most area, which will always be your layers above the original layer.

by
by
by
by
by
by