Here is the images from my item..they told me it needed alot of improvements.

Here is the images from my item..they told me it needed alot of improvements.

This is just too basic to be approved in any category.
Why would someone purchase this as a .PSD only to need to code it, when they could reproduce this directly in HTML in 20 minutes?
I honestly feel you need to spend more time learning basic design theories such as spacing, color theory and structure.
-Scott
You guys are just insulting the design…i asked for feedback, not negative comments..
As i sad
- redo the nav - as others have mentioned , spacing - redo the borders - fonts are to plain
C&C can sometimes be harsh, but always take it positive (tho i know sometimes it hurts).
DarkNurbs said
You guys are just insulting the design…i asked for feedback, not negative comments..
No we’re not, we’re just telling you how it is.
This is the design industry, harsh critique is everywhere.
Don’t like it? Then don’t post your work for critique.
We can sugar coat it if you like and tell you: “it’s a good start”, “work on it more”, “a few more weeks and it’ll be approved”
But would this help? No, you’d just end up wasting more time on being rejected.
These are the harsh realities of the design industry man, it’s just not good enough.
-Scott
Yes i sad it can be harsh maybe i should have sad it can be harsh, i agree but point that it doesn’t hurt your feelings but the ego 
But C&C is not “Why would someone purchase this as a .PSD only to need to code it, when they could reproduce this directly in HTML in 20 minutes?” that’s just plain bashing.
Any way thats just my opinion.
No, it’s not basing, it’s telling the truth, it could be reproduced in HTML in 20 minutes. Fact.
COPYRIGHT © 2012 ENVATO| TERMS OF USAGE| SUPPORT/HELP| ICONS BY TANGO + WEFUNCTION + FAMFAMFAM
Adobe®, Flash®, Flex®, Fireworks®, Photoshop®, Illustrator®, InDesign® and After Effects® are registered trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated.