210 posts
  • Affiliate Level 2
  • Author Level 4
  • Collector Level 1
  • Featured Author
+2 more
KR_Music
says

+1.
I think:
1. Tags (otherwise – why do it need?)
2. Description
3. Title
4. Else…

borissevastyanov
borissevastyanov Recent Posts Threads Started
242 posts
  • 3 Years of Membership
  • Affiliate Level 2
  • Author Level 4
  • Collector Level 2
+3 more
borissevastyanov
says

Agree! +1

62 posts
  • 4 Years of Membership
  • Affiliate Level 5
  • Author Level 3
  • Collector Level 1
+2 more
NanoArt
says

1. Tags (otherwise – why do it need?)
2. Description
3. Title
4. Else…
I agree!
1 post
  • 4 Years of Membership
  • Author Level 2
  • Collector Level 2
  • United Kingdom
marie-clare
says

I cannot see how the new search facility will benefit anyone because it is simply not geared towards searching for the most appropriate track content and arguably only whats in the song title. I am fairly new here however most my material was going to be quite original with real track/song names such as “Voice of Hope”, however having read this thread it seems naming my songs “female vocalist” would probably be more effective. I don’t think the buyers or composers want to names their songs this way.

Wouldn’t it be easier to have the original search and instead create an advanced search whereby the purchasers can search by track title or whatever it may be, keeping the original search set to “track relevancy”. Just my thoughts.

by
by
by
by
by
by