Even i was agreed with more high standards used in reviews, it seem i losed that train with a sharp idea about what mean for TF reviewers “our high standards”. I am not saying they aren’t doing a good job, even sometime i am not agreed with them (and i am not talking here about my rejected items).
This is not a rejection thread. Let’s not talk about reviewers. Also i don’t want to receive suggestions for what should i change there. I just want a yes or no answer at the following question:
Is that template, in your opinion (quality standards), is proper for the new Landing Page section? Would you buy something like this?
http://www.readactor.com/271110/
Thanks.
- Envato Staff
- Sold between 100 000 and 250 000 dollars
- Support Staff
- United States
- Author had a Free File of the Month
- Microlancer Beta Tester
- Beta Tester
- Interviewed on the Envato Notes blog
It’s really not as simple as saying “yes or no”.
I could say yes BUT …..
or, I could say no BECAUSE …
Either way, it will be helpful for you to get feedback regardless.
No.
That’s one of the answers you wanted right? 
But I think it’s not ready for TF. You need a more professional look, imho.
- Author had a Free File of the Month
- Author was Featured
- Bought between 10 and 49 items
- Egypt
- Exclusive Author
- Has been a member for 2-3 years
- Item was Featured
- Referred between 10 and 49 users
- Sold between 10 000 and 50 000 dollars
Yes
Yes.
But i have to say something, i think it would be a bit better if the clouds have a bit softer (slower) movement.
- Attended a Community Meetup
- Author was Featured
- Beta Tester
- Bought between 10 and 49 items
- Contributed a Tutorial to a Tuts+ Site
- Exclusive Author
- Has been a member for 3-4 years
- Interviewed on the Envato Notes blog
NO but your almost there.
- Repeatedly Helped protect Envato Marketplaces against copyright violations
- Item was Featured
- Author had a Free File of the Month
- Author was Featured
- Bought between 10 and 49 items
- Europe
- Exclusive Author
- Has been a member for 4-5 years
- Referred between 100 and 199 users
no…..its to simple, to….....well easy….....to like its created in an hour..
spend more time on it
it has some potential
No
No. But with some improvements, maybe. The problem with this design is the heavy amount of different typography you have used in it.
The header is amazing, nice idea with the moving clouds, however I think that the logo seems a bit strange. A good idea would be using the balloon to track the logo, using a kind of banner, and putting the text in it.
The content looks good. A suggestion for the footer would be using the titles in white, and not “blue”. Since it can’t be read that well. – or – Using a very soft blue.
I hope I have helped you. 
No.
The cloud animation is pretty harsh. It needs to move more fluid,
