Hi,
Uploaded 2 flyer designs few days ago… but rejected. 
The reason from the reviewer is,
1) Your file has some well done design concepts, however it does not meet the current and very stringent quality guidelines and we can not accept your file at this time. GraphicRiver recently announced a new policy for increased quality and design standards for accepted files. For more information, you can read about it here: http://graphicriver.net/forums/thread/important-new-quality-standards-on-graphicriver/35094 . To understand the quality of the files accepted to the GraphicRiver library, see the Popular Files list: http://graphicriver.net/page/top_sellers . If you would like feedback from your peers on improving your file, please visit the Item Discussion forum. (http://graphicriver.net/forums/topic/item-discussion/50 ) If you have a question on this rejection, you can also respond to this email and a reviewer will be glad to assist you.
You’ll need to work over this design somewhat here, considering things like the general style. Have a think about the tracking, leading, kerning, use of alignment, whitespace and proximity. Think about the font choice too and the general complexity.
I read the the ‘New Quality Standards on Graphicriver’ article few months ago but the reviewer says, ‘recently announced’ (!!!)
However…. This Rejection Email is just a template. I want some good feedback from you guys.
I’ll be blunt. They just don’t look good. The type is all over the place and the colors are not meshing well together.
To me it seems like you are trying to fit 10 pounds of shit into a 1 pound bag, which is never going to work.
Some of the best flyer designs are minimal in nature and are able to clearly present a message in an easy to read fashion, yet still be stylish enough to make an impact from a distance.
xstortionist,
Oh, Thanks a lot.. 
Shemul said
xstortionist, Oh, Thanks a lot..![]()
They just need much more work and much more attention to detail.
A different font for the info boxes. I hate Hobo STD ! It is hard to read but okay for a title.
